I seem to be leaning on Max a bit today. Via his next item, here's what security guards are defending against today.
Do you see why? Took me a minute, which I'll try to excuse on the basis of the misleadingly colorful illustration in Max's post. Answer is given in the comments. Or is it crashingly obvious? If so, why was the newspaper item so coy about it? Inquiring minds want to know.
No comments:
Post a Comment